The population rate of change of Van Zandt County, TX was 1.42% in 2018.
Population
Population Change
Above charts are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey | ODN Dataset | API -
Demographics and Population Datasets Involving Van Zandt County, TX
- API
CPI 1.1 Texas Child Population (ages 0-17) by County 2013-2022
data.texas.gov | Last Updated 2023-01-30T16:22:35.000ZAs recommended by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to ensure consistency across all HHSC agencies, in 2012 DFPS adopted the HHSC methodology on how to categorize race and ethnicity. As a result, data broken down by race and ethnicity in 2012 and after is not directly comparable to race and ethnicity data in 2011 and before. The population totals may not match previously printed DFPS Data Books. Past population estimates are adjusted based on the U.S. Census data as it becomes available. This is important to keep the data in line with current best practices, but may cause some past counts, such as Abuse/Neglect Victims per 1,000 Texas Children, to be recalculated. Population Data Source - Population Estimates and Projections Program, Texas State Data Center, Office of the State Demographer and the Institute for Demographic and Socioeconomic Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio. Current population estimates and projections data as of December 2020. Visit dfps.state.tx.us for information on all DFPS programs.
- API
Social Vulnerability Index for Virginia by Census Tract, 2018
data.virginia.gov | Last Updated 2023-05-22T14:49:26.000Z"ATSDR’s Geospatial Research, Analysis & Services Program (GRASP) created Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (CDC SVI or simply SVI, hereafter) to help public health officials and emergency response planners identify and map the communities that will most likely need support before, during, and after a hazardous event. SVI indicates the relative vulnerability of every U.S. Census tract. Census tracts are subdivisions of counties for which the Census collects statistical data. SVI ranks the tracts on 15 social factors, including unemployment, minority status, and disability, and further groups them into four related themes. Thus, each tract receives a ranking for each Census variable and for each of the four themes, as well as an overall ranking." For more see https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/documentation/SVI_documentation_2018.html
- API
National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM): COVIDVaxViews| Data | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov)
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2023-08-04T15:58:48.000ZNational Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM): CDC is providing information on COVID-19 vaccine confidence to supplement vaccine administration data. These data represent trends in vaccination status and intent, and other behavioral indicators, by demographics and other characteristics.
- API
National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM): Vaccination Status and Intent by Demographics
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2023-08-03T20:51:46.000ZNational Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM): CDC is providing information on COVID-19 vaccine confidence to supplement vaccine administration data. These data represent trends in vaccination status and intent by demographics. Following collection of August 2021 survey data, an error in data processing led to incorrect categorization of some survey respondents; some respondents who should have been categorized as MSA: Principal City instead were categorized as MSA: Non-Principal City. Data downloaded during the period September 12, 2021 through September 30, 2021 may have incorrect estimates by MSA status, SVI of county of residence, and political leaning of county of residence.
- API
National Immunization Survey Child COVID Module (NIS-CCM): Vaccination Status and Intent by Demographics | Data | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov)
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2023-08-03T18:27:46.000ZNational Immunization Survey Child COVID Module (NIS-CCM): CDC is providing information on COVID-19 vaccine confidence to supplement vaccine administration data. These data represent trends in vaccination status and intent, and other behavioral indicators, by demographics and other characteristics.
- API
2010 Census/ACS Basic Block Group Data
data.kcmo.org | Last Updated 2021-11-12T14:15:42.000Zbasic characteristics of people and housing for individual 2010 census block groups
- API
National Immunization Survey Child COVID Module (NIS-CCM): COVIDVaxViews| Data | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cdc.gov)
data.cdc.gov | Last Updated 2023-08-03T18:26:24.000ZNational Immunization Survey Child COVID Module (NIS-CCM): CDC is providing information on COVID-19 vaccine confidence to supplement vaccine administration data. These data represent trends in vaccination status and intent, and other behavioral indicators, by demographics and other characteristics.
- API
2010 Census/ACS Detailed Block Group Data
data.kcmo.org | Last Updated 2021-11-12T14:22:17.000Zdetailed characteristics of people and housing for individual 2010 census block groups
- API
Point In Time Homeless Survey Data
data.sonomacounty.ca.gov | Last Updated 2019-07-12T18:26:35.000ZThe County of Sonoma conducts an annual homeless count for the entire county. The survey data is derived from a sample of about 600 homeless persons countywide per year. The resulting information is statistically reliable only for the county as a whole, not for individual locations. The exception is the City of Santa Rosa, where the sample taken within the city is large enough to be predictive of the overall homeless population in that city.
- API
Travel Decision Survey 2019
data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2020-01-31T22:45:39.000Z**Please refer to the downloadable XLSX attachment (http://bit.ly/SFMTATravelSurvey2019) for the complete dataset, metadata, and instructions for use.** This workbook provides data and data dictionaries for the SFMTA 2019 Travel Decision Survey. On behalf of San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G) undertook a Mode Share Survey within the City and County of San Francisco as well as the eight surrounding Bay Area counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Marin, Santa Clara, Napa, Sonoma and Solano. The primary goals of this study were to: • Assess percent mode share for travel in San Francisco for evaluation of the SFMTA Strategic Objective 2.2: Mode Share target of 80% sustainable travel by 2030. • Evaluate the above statement based on the following parameters: number of trips to, from, and within San Francisco by Bay Area residents. Trips by visitors to the Bay Area and for commercial purposes are not included. • Provide additional trip details, including trip purpose for each trip in the mode share question series. • Collect demographic data on the population of Bay Area residents who travel to, from, and within San Francisco. • Collect data on travel behavior and opinions that support other SFMTA strategy and project evaluation needs. The survey was conducted as a telephone study among 801 Bay Area residents aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted in English, Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Tagalog. Surveying was conducted via random digit dial (RDD) and cell phone sample. All survey datasets incorporate respondent weighting based on age and home location; utilize the “weight” field when appropriate in your analysis. The survey period for this survey is as follows: 2019: May - August 2019 The margin of error is related to sample size (n). For the total sample, the margin of error is 3.3% for a confidence level of 95%. When looking at subsets of the data, such as just the SF population, just the female population, or just the population of people who bicycle, the sample size decreases and the margin of error increases. Below is a guide of the margin of error for different samples sizes. Be cautious in making conclusions based off of small sample sizes. At the 95% confidence level is: • n = 801(Total Sample). Margin of error = +/- 3.3% • n = 400. Margin of error = +/- 4.85% • n = 100. Margin of error = +/- 9.80%