The crime incident count of Meriden, CT was 116 for aggravated assault in 2012. The crime incident count of Taunton, MA was 188 for aggravated assault in 2012.

Crime Incident Count

Crime Incident Rate per 100,000 People

Crime statistics are sourced from the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program and aggregated across year and crime type. The FBI does not gather statistics for all jurisdictions, so some localities may be missing. Normalization is based on the population values published with the UCR data itself, so rather than on US Census data, as the jurisdiction of the data may vary. Crime rates are normalized on a per 100K basis; specifically, the crime count is divided by the population count, the result is then multiplied by 100K and rounded to the nearest integer value. Latest data, displayed in charts and other visualizations, is from 2014.

Above charts are based on data from the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program | ODN Dataset | API - Notes:

1. ODN datasets and APIs are subject to change and may differ in format from the original source data in order to provide a user-friendly experience on this site.

2. To build your own apps using this data, see the ODN Dataset and API links.

3. If you use this derived data in an app, we ask that you provide a link somewhere in your applications to the Open Data Network with a citation that states: "Data for this application was provided by the Open Data Network" where "Open Data Network" links to http://opendatanetwork.com. Where an application has a region specific module, we ask that you add an additional line that states: "Data about REGIONX was provided by the Open Data Network." where REGIONX is an HREF with a name for a geographical region like "Seattle, WA" and the link points to this page URL, e.g. http://opendatanetwork.com/region/1600000US5363000/Seattle_WA

Public Safety and Crime Datasets Involving Meriden, CT or Taunton, MA

  • API

    Racial Profiling Dataset 2015- Citations

    data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-07-29T17:18:39.000Z

    In order to protect the privacy of crime victims, addresses are generalized to the block level only and specific locations are not identified. Due to several factors (offense reclassification, reported versus occurred dates, etc.) comparisons should not be made between numbers generated with this database to any other official police reports. Data provided represents only calls for police service where a report was written. Totals in the database may vary considerably from official totals following investigation and final categorization. Therefore, the data should not be used for comparisons with Uniform Crime Report statistics. The Austin Police Department does not assume any liability for any decision made or action taken or not taken by the recipient in reliance upon any information or data provided. This Racial Profiling dataset (citations) provides the raw data needed to identify trends in traffic stops. It is used to help identify potential improvements in department policy, tactics, and training. Corresponding report: This data is used to produce the annual Racial Profiling report, posted on APD's website here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/racial-profiling-reports

  • API

    Opioid Seizures and Arrests Year 2013 - Current Quarterly County State Police

    data.pa.gov | Last Updated 2019-10-07T17:29:19.000Z

    This dataset contains summary information on opioid drug seizures and arrests made by Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) personnel, stationed statewide, on a quarterly basis. Every effort is made to collect and record all opioid drug seizures and arrests however, the information provided may not represent the totality of all seizures and opioid arrests made by PSP personnel. Data is currently available from January 1, 2013 through most current data available. Seizure Opioids seized as a result of undercover buys, search warrants, traffic stops and other investigative encounters. An incident is a Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) recorded violation of the Controlled Substance Act and an entry into the PSP Statistical Narcotics System. By regulation, entry is made by the PSP as stated in PSP Administrative Regulation 9-6: When violations of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act are reported, the required statistical information concerning the incident shall be entered into the Statistical Narcotic Reporting System (SNRS). Incidents may include undercover buys, search warrants, traffic stops and other investigative encounters So, an “incident” is not based on any arrest, but on a reported violation, though it often can include arrests. The incidents that are selected and forwarded to the portal are those that include a record of one or more seizures of the opioid drugs. In turn, a subset of those selected incidents also contains a record of one or more arrests. This is PSP data only, it would not include any Federal case/incident data.

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Arrests 2017

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2018-10-22T14:33:23.000Z

    Arrests are the number of persons arrested, cited or summoned for all criminal acts in Part I and Part II Crimes for the given jurisdiction. "Arrestee" refers to the nature of the crime and age or other relevant demographic information of the individual arrested.

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Arrests 2016

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2018-06-29T18:09:38.000Z

    Arrests are the number of persons arrested, cited or summoned for all criminal acts in Part I and Part II Crimes for the given jurisdiction. "Arrestee" refers to the nature of the crime and age or other relevant demographic information of the individual arrested.

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Offenses 2013

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2014-10-29T14:57:20.000Z

    The Uniform Crime Reporting Program measures the extent, fluctuation and distribution of crime throughout the United States. After counting Crime Index offenses reported, minus any unfounded complaints, contributors provide the number of “actual offenses” and the number of crimes cleared. For a criminal offense to be “cleared,” either of the following situations must prevail: (1) at least one person is arrested, charged, and turned over to the court for prosecution; or (2) some element beyond police control precludes the physical arrest of the offender (e.g., death of offender, victim refuses to cooperate, confession by offender already in police custody), resulting in the offense being cleared by “exceptional means.” Contributing agencies also include data on the value of property stolen and recovered in connection with the reported offenses, plus specific information regarding homicides, officers assaulted and arson.

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Arrests 2011

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2014-09-25T18:29:09.000Z

    Arrests are the number of persons arrested, cited or summoned for all criminal acts in Part I and Part II Crimes

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Arrests 2013

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2014-11-13T16:01:54.000Z

    Arrests are the number of persons arrested, cited or summoned for all criminal acts in Part I and Part II Crimes

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Offenses 2011

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2014-09-25T18:29:02.000Z

    The Uniform Crime Reporting Program measures the extent, fluctuation and distribution of crime throughout the United States. After counting Crime Index offenses reported, minus any unfounded complaints, contributors provide the number of “actual offenses” and the number of crimes cleared. For a criminal offense to be “cleared,” either of the following situations must prevail: (1) at least one person is arrested, charged, and turned over to the court for prosecution; or (2) some element beyond police control precludes the physical arrest of the offender (e.g., death of offender, victim refuses to cooperate, confession by offender already in police custody), resulting in the offense being cleared by “exceptional means.” Contributing agencies also include data on the value of property stolen and recovered in connection with the reported offenses, plus specific information regarding homicides, officers assaulted and arson.

  • API

    Uniform Crime Reporting System Offenses in 2010

    data.ct.gov | Last Updated 2014-09-23T19:30:41.000Z

    The Uniform Crime Reporting Program measures the extent, fluctuation and distribution of crime throughout the United States. After counting Crime Index offenses reported, minus any unfounded complaints, contributors provide the number of “actual offenses” and the number of crimes cleared. For a criminal offense to be “cleared,” either of the following situations must prevail: (1) at least one person is arrested, charged, and turned over to the court for prosecution; or (2) some element beyond police control precludes the physical arrest of the offender (e.g., death of offender, victim refuses to cooperate, confession by offender already in police custody), resulting in the offense being cleared by “exceptional means.” Contributing agencies also include data on the value of property stolen and recovered in connection with the reported offenses, plus specific information regarding homicides, officers assaulted and arson.

  • API

    2017 Racial Profiling Dataset Citations

    data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-07-29T17:29:51.000Z

    AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT DATA DISCLAIMER 1. The data provided are for informational use only and may differ from official APD crime data. 2. APD’s crime database is continuously updated, so reports run at different times may produce different results. Care should be taken when comparing against other reports as different data collection methods and different data sources may have been used. 3. The Austin Police Department does not assume any liability for any decision made or action taken or not taken by the recipient in reliance upon any information or data provided.