- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-02-11T21:36:34.000Z
This data set contains checkbook expenditure data for Utah's 29 counties for fiscal year 2014. This data was migrated from Transparent.Utah.gov.
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-06-14T22:33:32.000Z
This data set contains household survey data from Census. The American Community Survey was developed by the Census Bureau to replace the long form of the decennial census program. The ACS is a large demographic survey collected throughout the year using mailed questionnaires, telephone interviews, and visits from Census Bureau field representatives to about 3.5 million household addresses annually. Starting in 2005, the ACS produced social, housing, and economic characteristic data for demographic groups in areas with populations of 65,000 or more. (Prior to 2005, the estimates were produced for areas with 250,000 or more population.) The ACS also accumulates sample over 3-year and 5-year intervals to produce estimates for smaller geographic areas, including census tracts and block groups.
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-06T23:46:50.000Z
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-04-18T22:44:27.000Z
The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) program produces employment and wage estimates annually for over 800 occupations. These estimates are available for the nation as a whole, for individual States, and for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas; national occupational estimates for specific industries are also available.
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-07T01:20:40.000Z
This dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the Northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the Southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe’s Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe’s Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS.
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-07T07:09:22.000Z
This map shows current UDOT permits. This map includes the following permit types: encroachment, access, billboards, house move, junk yards, manhole access, special event, and storm drains. The data in this map is updated daily. For questions on this map please contact Tony Lau at email@example.com.
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2016-08-24T20:31:42.000Z
Shared by Utah SITLA on April 30, 2013. Updated a year ago. Other Mineral Plat map includes SITLA other mineral contracts: - Oil Shale - Other Mineral - Tar Sands - Sand & Gravel Also: General reference information: PLSS, County Bndy and Place Names (for search only).
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-02-11T21:18:30.000Z
Utah Ave Employment & Establishments Payroll NAICS 2003 Q2
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-02-11T21:17:58.000Z
Utah Ave Employment & Establishments Payroll NAICS 2009 Q2
- API opendata.utah.gov | Last Updated 2019-02-11T20:51:26.000Z
Utah First Congressional District Population, Employment, Education Statistics from the American Community Survey