- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-03T21:13:13.000Z
A. SUMMARY This dataset was first created as part of the SFMTA On Street Car Share Pilot Program (approved by the MTA Board in July 2013) to illustrate the location of implemented and planned (various stages) spaces throughout the city. B. METHODOLOGY The locations were originally provided to the MTA as requests by the three car share organizations (CSOs). These were given as a .kml file, which was converted to a .shp. Additional fields were created using spatial joins (zipcode, supervisor district, CNN, etc). Use definition query tool to display those locations with a certain attribute. For example, query Existing = 1 to display those locations that are on street operating. 500 submissions were given by CSOs to the MTA, but only a portion of those were brought to the MTA Board for approval, and even fewer were implemented as operational on street spaces. With no definition query, you can see all spaces as features, with varying levels of data completion. C. UPDATE FREQUENCY During periods of implementation/construction, updates were as frequent as daily or weekly. However, as the frequency of newly implemented spaces slowed over the course of the pilot, updates occurred less frequently--weekly or monthly. Updates will be needed as new spaces are implemented--many of the spaces not taken past MTA Board approval have incomplete data. D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO Each feature (or each row, or point) represents a single car share parking space. Some parking spaces belong to a "pod" where there are two adjacent car share parking spaces, indicated by the "PodType" field. To summarize or analyze by pod, use the "POD" field.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:34:35.000Z
his layer is the data feeding into the San Francisco Green Roofs web map. This map and further information about green roofs in San Francisco can be found at the Planning Department's Green Roofs website: http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=3839. If you know of any other green roofs in San Francisco please contact Andrew Perry (Andrew.Perry@sfgov.org) and he will add it to the map.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-02T18:01:09.000Z
"A. SUMMARY Parking regulations by blockface for the City of San Francisco. Includes the following regulations: Residential Parking Permits, Time limits, Government Permit, No overnight, Oversized Vehicle. Does not include non metered color curb or curb cuts. Update as of 1/1/2018: started recording No parking any time (regulations like ""TOW AWAY NO PARKING""), Limited No Parking (tow-away or no parking for certain periods of the day), B. METHODOLOGY Mix of manual updates and data compilation. C. UPDATE FREQUENCY Updated as MTA Board resolutions are passed that impact parking regulations. D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO This dataset has not been comprehesively updated or vetted for accuracy. Dataset does not include color curb regulations such as loading zones or blue zones. Does not include detailed information for metered parking such as cap color or operating hours, which is contained in a separate relational database maintained by SFpark. No parking any time blockfaces were verified using Google Streetview, and only for Mission Bay blockfaces (Feburary 2017). "
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:36:48.000Z
These geographic designations were created to define geographic areas within San Francisco that have a higher density of vulnerable populations. These geographic designations will be used for the Health Care Services Master Plan and DPH's Community Health Needs Assessment. aov_fin - 1 = YES aov_fin - 0 = NO AOV's were defined using 2012-2016 ACS data at the census tract level and the following criteria: 1) Top 1/3rd for < 200% poverty or < 400% poverty & top 1/3rd for persons of color OR 2) Top 1/3rd for < 200% poverty or < 400% poverty & top 1/3rd for youth or seniors (65+) OR 3) Top 1/3rd for < 200% poverty or < 400% poverty & top 1/3rd for 2 other categories (unemployment, high school or less, limited English proficiency persons, linguistically isolated households, or disability) Tracts that had unstable data for an indicator were automatically given zero credit for that indicator. That is why two language variables are included in the bonus group, because there tend to be a high number of tracts with unstable data for language variables.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T00:25:17.000Z
Consolidated Infant, Pre-K, and K-14 education points for facilities both public and private. Point features are intended to be located within a building footprint relevant to each site, so that they can be used to select an appropriate building footprint or parcel as seed for any required buffering. Buffering may be applied when limiting possible sites for certain businesses or specific individuals, whenever these must remain a minimum distance from school locations. Sources include: cde.ca.gov State of California Department of Education City and County Department of Technology, San Francisco Enterprise Geographic Information System Program Data current as of December 8, 2015
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-23T17:15:03.000Z
The San Francisco Department of Public Health Flood Health Vulnerability Index is a composite index that measures the spatial distribution and relative vulnerability of San Francisco communities to the health impacts of flood inundation and extreme storms. The index is constructed using socioeconomic and demographic, exposure, health, and housing indicators and is intended to serve as a planning tool for health and climate adaptation. Steps for calculating the index can be found in in the "An Assessment of San Francisco’s Vulnerability to Flooding & Extreme Storms" located at https://sfclimatehealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/FloodVulnerabilityReport_v5.pdf.pdf Data dictionary can be found in the attachments section of the metadata.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-10-16T18:21:43.000Z
Effective July 26, 2014, City law impose reporting requirements on developers of certain City real estate projects with an estimated construction cost of more than $1,000,000. Developers must file five forms with the Ethics Commission over the course of about a year disclosing donations to nonprofit organizations that have contacted City officials about their project. The first form is due within 30 days of certification of an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") by a local agency or, if the project relies on a program EIR, within 30 days of the adoption of a final environmental determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Disclosure is not required for a residential development project with four or fewer dwelling units. A disclosure report must be completed and filed by the developer of any "major project." A major project is a real estate development project located in the City and County of San Francisco with estimated construction costs exceeding $1,000,000 where either: The Planning Commission or any other local lead agency certifies an Environmental Impact Review ("EIR") for the project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); or The project relies on a program EIR and the Planning Department, Planning Commission, or any other local lead agency adopts any final environmental determination under CEQA. (See below to determine when a final environmental determination is adopted.)A major project does not include a residential development project with four or fewer dwelling units. For purposes of this filing requirement, a "developer" includes the individual or entity that is the project sponsor responsible for filing a completed Environmental Evaluation Application ("EEA") with the Planning Department (or other lead agency) under CEQA. However, if an individual who signs and submits the EEA will not be responsible for obtaining the entitlements or developing the major project, the developer is instead the individual or entity that is responsible for obtaining such entitlements. A developer must use the SFEC 3500 form to file a total of five reports with the Ethics Commission with respect to each major project. The first (or initial) report must be filed within 30 days of the date the Planning Commission or any other local lead agency certifies the EIR for that project or, for a major project relying on a program EIR, within 30 days of the date that the Planning Department, Planning Commission, or any other local lead agency adopts a final environmental determination under CEQA. 1The developer must also use this form to file four subsequent quarterly reports, beginning with the quarter in which in the initial report is filed. The due dates for the quarterly reports are: April 15 for the period starting January 1 and ending March 31; July 15 for the period starting April 1 and ending June 30;October 15 for the period starting July 1 and ending September 30; and January 15 for the period starting October 1 and ending December 31.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-06T17:45:29.000Z
Registered lobbyists must complete a training held by the Ethics Commission within one year of their initial registration, as well as any additional training required by the Ethics Commission’s Executive Director. Lobbyists can satisfy this requirement by watching a web training video: https://sfethics.org/compliance/lobbyists/contact-lobbyists/training Upon completion of the filing, lobbyists must file the Certificate of Lobbyist Training form. This dataset represents the date and time a lobbyist filed the Certificate of Lobbyist Training form and includes forms filed as of January 1, 2018. Data is updated automatically in this dataset as it is submitted and approved.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:32:10.000Z
Since 2005, the San Francisco Park Evaluation Program (SFPEP) has regularly evaluated and assessed the conditions of all San Francisco civic plazas and squares, mini parks, neighborhood parks and playgrounds, parkways and regional parks. The City Services Auditor division of the Controller’s Office and Recreation & Parks Department (RPD) staff conduct quarterly evaluations and use the results to communicate the condition of San Francisco’s parks to RPD management and park staff, elected officials, and the public, and to improve park conditions by efficient resource allocation and improved maintenance. Starting with fiscal year 2015, the data are collected and maintained in a source system with the Contoller's office, prior historic data will be provided by Rec and Park.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T21:10:36.000Z
Snapshot of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) and the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII) affordable housing pipeline projects. The projects listed are in the process of development--or are anticipated to be developed--in partnership with non-profit or for-profit developers and financed through city funding agreements, ground leases, disposition and participation agreements and conduit bond financing. The Affordable Housing Pipeline also includes housing units produced by private developers through the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program. Data reflects all projects as of March 31, 2019.