- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-03T21:13:13.000Z
A. SUMMARY This dataset was first created as part of the SFMTA On Street Car Share Pilot Program (approved by the MTA Board in July 2013) to illustrate the location of implemented and planned (various stages) spaces throughout the city. B. METHODOLOGY The locations were originally provided to the MTA as requests by the three car share organizations (CSOs). These were given as a .kml file, which was converted to a .shp. Additional fields were created using spatial joins (zipcode, supervisor district, CNN, etc). Use definition query tool to display those locations with a certain attribute. For example, query Existing = 1 to display those locations that are on street operating. 500 submissions were given by CSOs to the MTA, but only a portion of those were brought to the MTA Board for approval, and even fewer were implemented as operational on street spaces. With no definition query, you can see all spaces as features, with varying levels of data completion. C. UPDATE FREQUENCY During periods of implementation/construction, updates were as frequent as daily or weekly. However, as the frequency of newly implemented spaces slowed over the course of the pilot, updates occurred less frequently--weekly or monthly. Updates will be needed as new spaces are implemented--many of the spaces not taken past MTA Board approval have incomplete data. D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO Each feature (or each row, or point) represents a single car share parking space. Some parking spaces belong to a "pod" where there are two adjacent car share parking spaces, indicated by the "PodType" field. To summarize or analyze by pod, use the "POD" field.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-11-05T15:30:01.000Z
Effective January 1, 2015, an individual who qualifies as a permit consultant under San Francisco law must register and file quarterly reports with the Ethics Commission. A permit consultant is an individual who receives or is promised compensation to provide permit consulting services on a "major project" or a "minor project", including any employee who receives compensation for time spent on permit consulting services. "Permit consulting services" means any contact with the Department of Building Inspection, the Entertainment Commission, the Planning Department, or the Department of Public Works to help a permit applicant obtain a permit. "Permit consulting services" do not include simple requests for information which do not otherwise include attempts to help obtain a permit. A "major project" is a real estate development project located in the City and County of San Francisco with estimated construction costs exceeding $1,000,000 and which requires a permit issued by the Department of Building Inspection or the Planning Department. Estimated constructions costs are to be calculated in the same manner used to determine building permit fees under the Building Code. A "minor project" is a project located in the City and County of San Francisco which requires a permit issued by the Entertainment Commission. The following individuals are not permit consultants and thus are not required to register or report: -a licensed architect or engineer of record for construction activity allowed or contemplated by the permit, or an employee of that architect or engineer; -a contractor who will be responsible for all construction activity associated with the requested permit, or an employee of that contractor; or -an employee or agent of an organization with tax exempt status under 26 United States Code Section 501(c)(3) communicating on behalf of that organization regarding the development of a project for that organization. Each permit consultant must register with the Ethics Commission no later than five business days after providing permit consulting services. Quarterly disclosure reports must subsequently be filed with the Ethics Commission
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:09:27.000Z
The Controller's Office's City Services Auditor (CSA) Division has worked with the Department of Public Works (DPW) to develop maintenance standards for streets and sidewalks and schedules and inspect for compliance since July 2004. This data file consolidates street and sidewalk inspection results FY07-FY11. Current evaluation results are also available on DataSF; however, they are not comparable to this data set because of changes in methodology.You can access the annual reports at http://sfcontroller.org/index.aspx?page=49
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-20T23:01:19.000Z
This data set includes all of the publicly-sited works in the Civic Art Collection, which includes historic monuments, murals, and artworks commissioned through the City's Public Art Program. The data set includes the following categories: artist name, title of work, medium, dimensions and location.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:34:35.000Z
his layer is the data feeding into the San Francisco Green Roofs web map. This map and further information about green roofs in San Francisco can be found at the Planning Department's Green Roofs website: http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=3839. If you know of any other green roofs in San Francisco please contact Andrew Perry (Andrew.Perry@sfgov.org) and he will add it to the map.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T02:07:24.000Z
A. SUMMARY Estimated yearly pedestrian crossings at each San Francisco intersection B. METHODOLOGY http://archives.sfmta.com/cms/rpedmast/documents/FinalPedestrianCountReport6_17_11.pdf C. UPDATE FREQUENCY No regular updates D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO Volume estimates made with 2011 transportation data and 2000 US Census data
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-02T18:01:09.000Z
"A. SUMMARY Parking regulations by blockface for the City of San Francisco. Includes the following regulations: Residential Parking Permits, Time limits, Government Permit, No overnight, Oversized Vehicle. Does not include non metered color curb or curb cuts. Update as of 1/1/2018: started recording No parking any time (regulations like ""TOW AWAY NO PARKING""), Limited No Parking (tow-away or no parking for certain periods of the day), B. METHODOLOGY Mix of manual updates and data compilation. C. UPDATE FREQUENCY Updated as MTA Board resolutions are passed that impact parking regulations. D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO This dataset has not been comprehesively updated or vetted for accuracy. Dataset does not include color curb regulations such as loading zones or blue zones. Does not include detailed information for metered parking such as cap color or operating hours, which is contained in a separate relational database maintained by SFpark. No parking any time blockfaces were verified using Google Streetview, and only for Mission Bay blockfaces (Feburary 2017). "
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-09-06T01:16:12.000Z
Web Analytics for SFGov sites - 2016 (Q1+Q2+Q3)
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-12-04T20:08:20.000Z
A. SUMMARY This feature class shows the location of all designated Commuter Shuttle Program stops. B. METHODOLOGY Tracks the current and historical Commuter Shuttle Program stop network, which is frequently adjusted by the SFMTA Board. C. UPDATE FREQUENCY Points added when new stops are created. D. OTHER CRITICAL INFO Updated whenever stops are changed, on average every one to two months. Historical stops need to be re-added.
- API data.sfgov.org | Last Updated 2019-11-04T16:25:55.000Z
Privately-owned public open spaces (POPOS) are publicly accessible spaces in forms of plazas, terraces, atriums, small parks, and even snippets which are provided and maintained by private developers. In San Francisco, POPOS mostly appear in the Downtown office district area. Prior to 1985, developers provided POPOS under three general circumstances: voluntarily, in exchange for a density bonus, or as a condition of approval. The 1985 Downtown Plan created the first systemic requirements for developers to provide publicly accessible open space as a part of projects in C-3 Districts. The goal was to “provide in the downtown quality open space in sufficient quantity and variety to meet the needs of downtown workers, residents and visitors.” (See Planning Code Section 138 for regulations). Since then, project sponsors for residential projects may provide POPOS instead of their required open spaces in the Downtown Residential (DTR) and Eastern Neighborhoods (Section 135 of the Planning Code). Learn more at http://sf-planning.org/privately-owned-public-open-space-and-public-art-popos